Many people will just mount the tiny kit zoom and will be happy all day long.The beauty of the platform is the small footprint.
My favorite walkaround lens on the M6 is the EF24mm f/2.8 IS USM. It sits in Canon's M lineup between the M3 and M5, and is sold with the 15-45 and 18-150mm lenses as kit options for $899 and $1,279 respectively.Because they are on the same segment? It is a sweet and capable camera and I love it dearly.
This gives you access to a huge variety of lenses from prime to wide-angle that are respected by enthusiasts and professional photographers from around the world.
The best high-end camera costing more than $2000 should have plenty of resolution, exceptional build quality, good 4K video capture and top-notch autofocus for advanced and professional users. With its twin control dials and very similar underlying hardware, the M6 is essentially an EOS 77D but without the bulk/utility of an optical viewfinder and with a smaller choice of lenses (unless you forfeit some of the size benefit and use an adapter). The update allows the camera to output 5.9K/29.97p and Super 35 format 4K/59.94p Raw video to Atomos Ninja V recorders. It’s ditched the exposure compensation dial on the top plate to equip the camera with a Dial Func control which can be switched up to control a variety of settings.The EOS M6 Mark II represents a fairly dramatic overhaul of that camera.
that's fair, no doubt about that..Canon are the go to brand because they are Canon. It's sensor is nearly flawless. Sure, it works for that.
It has electronic aka software stabilisation which crops into image and can be combined with lens optical IS but only for video.
Since this takes really good pictures in both Raw and JPEG, that gets it a long way towards 80%.He must be a real Keyboard Warrior!My experience with the Sony A6000 is enough for me. Who wants to hear nagatives but DP is the prime page for opinions, one of a few places ones can comment their inputs without purchasing.
But now that's it's here, what is it really like to use? I hate the stiff exposure compensation dial. For others, I'm sure it's their perfect camera they have been waiting for.As you've said, the M5 and M6 are extremely similar, so this seemed a good opportunity to explore a lighter review format, even if it doesn't work for everyone.
I did not manage to sell the Zeiss 55mm f/1.8. DSLR lenses are simply HEAVY and HUGE. (Also it's 4K video is brilliant, only H.265 encoding is a bit annoying. Next one will probably be 6D mk2.How am I supposed to use your studio tests to compare when the competitors such as Fuji and sony are equipped with modern $1000 lenses? Is like Canon got stucked in 2012... Ths truth is that a refrigerator brand has a much better camaera than any Canon mirrorless camera and it was released 4 years ago...not everyone needs or even wants 4K.. something dpreview users can't just seem to grasp."At the high end both Nikon and the ever amazing Sony and the Leica SL seems to lead the field."However unlike Sony, who orgasms with spec sheets that need a ton of fine print, canon simply calls it 49 point AF. Launched at the same time as the Canon EOS 90D DSLR, the EOS M6 Mark II is not only an evolution of the previous M6; in some respects it's a miniature 90D, as … more control dials and direct control, lossless compressed raws that sony can't seem to do if their life depends on it, mic port, smoother video AF, isn't kitted up with the worst kit lens from any manufacturer,etc,etc."Why would anyone buy the M6 or even the M5 when they can buy the sharply-reduced-in-price Sony A6000?""something dpreview users can't just seem to grasp." - Sounds like a lot of users DO want/need 4K though.I have this camera (EOS M6) and the images are sharp and not particularly over-processed when shooting in JPEG.