I always like having the latest technology, and I like the AF upgrades, but losing the fiber optic ability makes this a no-go upgrade for me.Is there any chance you could do a similar article and Table covering the Sony Full frame A7, A7S, A7R and A9 series cameraI’ll sticking to APS-C for the total weight of camera body and lens.Like so many others, I entered the Sony APS C family to seek something smaller but able to get better colours and dynamic range than point and shoots. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2000 and recommended the best.This is why it is still selling after all these years, and if Sony doesn't force it out, it will continue to sell.Sony to cameras : Apple to phonesAs others have pointed out, this article very badly needs a table that shows the specifications / features of the various models side-by-side for comparison.Is this a video only type comment?
Used with Real-time Eye AF or with Real-time Tracking it dramatically expands your range of shooting options.The camera is resistant to dust and moisture, with a top cover, front cover, internal frame, and rear cover constructed from a lightweight but sturdy magnesium alloy.Elevate your photography with Imaging Edge desktop applications. Focus acquisition is also faster according to Sony, with the A6600 locking in 0.02s versus 0.05s on the A6500. In addition to its 12MP sensor it offers must faster processing, improved autofocus, 4K/120p video capture and the highest resolution EVF we've seen yet.The A6100 isn't cheap enough to justify a janky EVF, weaker build quality, and other downsides vs the A6400.
They need to catch up to Sony in AF, gain 180 flip out screens, and lose the overheating in 4k. Given how much easier to use and more powerful the AF is on the latest cameras, I felt that most people would get more out of the newer models. Changing the AF point on the a6000 is pretty clunky, whereas on the a6100 it's both easier and needed less often. And from my experiences with the A6000 and A6300 and A6500.But still, seems like a much better deal. At a setting of 10fps or even 8 is usually enough.Ziginox; if you’re replying to me, you need to get your facts right.
For this reason, we decided to put together a comparison of all Sony A6x00-series cameras starting from the A6000 all the way to A6600.I currently shoot underwater photos with an a6500 and love it. It promises a comparison among the a6000, a6100, a6300, a6400, a6500 and a6600 - but then ignores most of them. But then it will do that all day long also.I prefer the plastic body of the A6100. In such cases the focus area selected in advance is applied.The 2.36 million-dot XGA OLED Tru-Finder electronic viewfinder has the ability to deliver continuous live shooting at up to 8 fps with AF/AE tracking - making it easy to track fast moving subjects - thanks to overall improvements in the EVF algorithm. ; but those are obviously moving targets depending on burst speed and buffer size so they boil it down to write speed since they're testing for what card you need/want rather than anything else. As Chris and Jordan highlight in their review, it features some useful upgrades over to the [apparently immortal] a6000.The truth is A6000 is excellent, and more than good enough for most people. @StopTheGAS: I guess you are the one who called Fuji overpriced crap on the 16-80mm f4 announcement, only with another name?Sony fans do seem the most "new stuff is better" types.EDIT: I just realized someone else asked for the same earlier...Second, for ILCs, whether going by Amazon, BCN or most other sales sites, there are always plenty of Canon DLSRs ranked higher.
I kinda wish they'd just showed the numbers they use to arrive at the write speed, since ultimately that's more useful to the user, they do to an extent on the text under their tables...I wasn’t impressed with my 16mm Sigma. Area specific noise reduction results in low noise even at high ISO which ranges from 100 – 32,000 (Expandable up to ISO 102,400). The A6600 is a joke for $1,400 with one top dial, an old sensor, and UHS-1 interface.Richard Butler sir, I m planning to buy a sony 6100 or 6400, just from JPEG picture point of view which one I should buy .